This article should be useful to those of you looking for mid-range gaming and work laptops, as it examines the two mainstream processors from Intel and AMD that are currently available (as of mid-2023 and later) in the same chassis and total specifications (same RAM, storage, and GPU).
The Intel Core i7-11800H (Tiger Lake 11th gen platform, 10 nm) and AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (Cezanne Zen3 platform, 7 nm) are two 8-core/16-thread CPUs that are comparable in many ways but differ in a few key ones.
The test laptops are from the Asus TUF Gaming series, with the A15 based on AMD and the F15 based on Intel, both of which start at under $1000. But for the sake of this post, it doesn’t matter; what counts is that we’re evaluating these two CPUs in the same mid-range chassis, with the same thermal design and parameters. Nvidia RTX 3060 Laptop 90-95W dGPUs were included in both devices, along with 16 GB of single-rank RAM in dual-channel, SSD storage, and Nvidia RTX 3060 Laptop 90-95W dGPUs.
So, regardless of the brand and type of laptop you choose, this article will be valuable in determining which of these two processors to use on a mid-level laptop in 2023 and after.
Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s have a look at the specifications for these two processors.
Spec sheets for Intel Core i7-11800H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
|Tiger Lake 11th generation Intel Core i7-11800H||Cezanne Zen3 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H|
|Process of construction||SuperFin 10 nm||TSMC FinFET 7 nm|
|Base Frequency of the CPU||2.3 GHz||3.2 GHz|
|All Cores – Turbo||4.2 GHz||4.0 GHz|
|1 Core Turbo||4.6 GHz||4.4 GHz|
|L3 Cache||24 MB||16 MB|
|Memory||Up to 128 GB DDR4-3200||Up to 128 GB DDR4-3200|
|Graphics||Iris Xe from Intel||Radeon Vega 8 graphics card|
As previously stated, each of these chips are 8C/16T and can attain similar frequencies. The i7 has a lower Base Clock on paper, but that’s irrelevant because Turbo Boost always affects frequencies in real-world situations. In fact, both of these processors have greater TDPs than most modern laptops’ default TDPs, and their performance is greatly dependent on the power settings used by each manufacturer, which are in turn dependent on the internal VRM design of each motherboard and the thermal module chosen by the OEMs. The higher the power these processors can run at in prolonged loads, and hence the higher the performance they can produce, the more capable the design and thermal module are.
This implies that not all laptops are made equal, and if you’re looking for a computer that can maximize the performance of these CPUs, you should read reviews to learn more about the power settings and how each device performs in demanding loads and games.
Before we get into the benchmarks and performance data on our TUF Gaming samples, I should point out that the fact that Intel is built on a 10 nm lithography and AMD on a 7 nm lithography can be deceiving, because the technologies utilized by Intel and TSMC are not directly comparable (which makes the AMD processors). In general, Intel’s 11th generation processors require a little more power for peak performance than AMD’s, and they’re also less efficient in everyday use, something you should consider if you plan to use the laptop unplugged frequently.
Your text will be rewritten by QuillBot. Start by typing or pasting something into this box, then hit the enter key.
Benchmarks of the Intel Core i7-11800H and AMD Ryzen 7 5800H processors
We’re looking at two identical test laptops here, one built on an Intel Core i7-11800H platform and the other on an AMD Ryzen 7 5800H platform, as previously stated. Both come with 16 GB of single-rank dual-channel memory, SSD storage, and identical RTX 3060 Laptop dGPUs, as well as the same chassis and thermal module design. So this is as close to an apples-to-apples comparison as you can get between these two processors.
Oh, and we’re testing these using the same GeForce drivers and Asus software as of late July 2023 in each case.
So, now that that’s out of the way, let’s talk about sustained CPU performance in the Cinebench loop test, which repeats the same test 15+ times in a loop with a 1-2 second delay between runs.
On the highest Turbo setting, the two have identical performance, but the AMD model has 2-4 percent higher sustained scores, despite the fact that it runs at a lower sustained power of 74+W, and the Intel model runs at 79+W. This allows the AMD unit to run slightly quieter, with fans increasing to 42-43 dB at head-level, compared to 44-45 dB on Intel units. In both cases, the temperatures are in the high-80s.
In both situations, quieter profiles are available, but those will be discussed in the A15 versus F15 comparison page.
These findings were also validated in the more demanding Cinebench R23 test, in which the CPUs ended up running at the same 74+W and 79+W sustained TDPs, but the Intel CPU scored somewhat higher than the AMD.
Similar results were shown in the 3DMark CPU profile test, where the Intel i7-11800H outperformed the AMD R7-5800H across the board, with up to 15% higher scores in some cases.
In fact, as you can see below, the i7 tends to dominate most of the benchmarks we conducted on our review unit. The Intel variant had a larger and quicker SSD, which had a minor impact on PassMark and PCMark scores but not on the others.
|Ryzen 7 + 3060 TUF A15||Intel i7 + 3060 TUF F15|
|Fire Strike is the thirteenth test in the 3DMark series.||17472 (Graphics: 18651, Physics: 23300, and Combination: 9448)||18651 (Graphics 20538, Physics 23509, and Combination 9331)|
|Port Royal in 3DMark 13||4411||4669|
|Time Spy – 3DMark 13||7400 (7218 graphics, 8640 CPU)||(Graphics – 7869, CPU – 9406) 8066 (Graphics – 7869, CPU – 9406)|
|Handbrake 1.3.1 (encodes 4K to 1080p):||The average frame rate is 39.78 frames per second.||The average frame rate is 43.63 frames per second.|
|PassMark10||(4894) (CPU: 22598 3D Graphics: 11571, Disk: 16661)||3950 (CPU: 23081 3D Graphics: 13681, Disk: 18068)|
|PCMark 10||6668 (E – 10333, P – 9022, DCC – 8633) (E – 10333, P – 9022, DCC – 8633) (E – 10333, P –||6799 (E – 10234, P – 8764, DCC – 9509) (E – 10234, P – 8764, DCC – 9509) (E – 10234, P|
|64-bit GeekBench 5.3.1||1419 single-core, 7376 multi-core||1545 single-core, 8107 multi-core|
|R15 CineBench (best run)||CPU Single Core 230 cb, CPU 2176 cb||CPU Single Core 227 cb, CPU 2161 cb|
|R20 CineBench (best run)||CPU Single Core 551 cb, 4901 cb||CPU Single Core 572 cb, CPU 5327 cb|
|R23 CineBench (best run)||CPU Single Core 1395 cb, CPU 12668 cb||CPU Single Core 1494 cb, CPU 13226 cb|
|64-bit x265 HD Benchmark||29.34 fps||29.48 frames per second|
On the same Turbo profiles, we ran some Workstation-related loads. The variations are minor, but they favor the Intel setup once again.
|Ryzen 7 + 3060 TUF A15||Intel i7 + 3060 TUF F15|
|Blender 2.90 – CPU Compute BMW Car Scene||3m 22s||3m 9s|
|Blender 2.90 – CPU Compute – Classroom Scene||9m 57s||8m 46s|
|Blender 2.90 – GPU, CUDA – Classroom scene||3m 37s||2m 20s|
|3DSMax SPECviewerf 2023||71.67||83.33|
|Catia SPECviewerf 2023||46.53||50.79|
|Creo SPECviewerf 2023||66.1||83.89|
|2020 SPECviewerf – Energy||17.49||19.98|
|Maya SPECviewerf 2023||210.33||243.02|
|Medical SPECviewerf 2023||24.75||25.08|
|2020 SPECviewerf – SNX||15.25||15.97|
|SW SPECviewerf 2023||138.02||157.52|
It’s crucial to note that both of these TUF Gaming laptops use the same type of memory, which is a Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-2G2E2 2x 8 GB kit. This kit is dual-channel, but it’s also one of the newest Single Rank RAM sets, which has a noticeable influence on various benchmarks and games.
I don’t have any Dual-Rank memory to test on these TUFs right now, but upgrading the default RAM would boost several of these scores and bring the Intel and AMD options closer together in terms of performance.
In a future article, I’ll look into further evaluating the influence of single and dual rank RAM on these two processors.
However, in terms of benchmarks and general performance in a mid-range implementation with 2x 8 GB of single-rank memory, this is what you should expect from the i7-11800H and the R7 5800H for the time being.
the outcome of the game
We also played a few games on our two devices to test how the two CPUs affected the experience. In the supported titles, both units use the same kind and amount of RAM, as well as the identical Nvidia RTX 3060 Laptop dGPU at 80 to 95W of power with Dynamic Boost 2.0.
Here are some results at FHD resolution and on the Turbo profile, which we’ll go over later.
|Optimus FHD Turbo||80-95W TUF A15 Ryzen 7 5800H + RTX 3060||Core i7-11800H + RTX 3060 80-95W TUF F15|
|Battlefield V is a first-person shooter that was (DX 12, Ultra Preset, RTX OFF)||101 frames per second (51 frames per second – 1% low)||111 frames per second (59 frames per second – 1% low)|
|The year is 2077, and the setting is Cyberpunk (DX 12, Ultra Preset, RTX OFF)||52 frames per second (42 frames per second – 1% low)||52 frames per second (40 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Far Cry 5 is the fifth installment in the Far Cry series (DX 11, Ultra Preset, SMAA)||97 frames per second (78 frames per second – 1% low)||105 frames per second (81 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Shadow of Mordor is a film set in Middle Earth.||137 frames per second (99 frames per second – 1% low)||143 frames per second (100 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Red Dead Redemption 2 is a sequel to Red Dead Redemption (DX 12, Ultra Optimized, TAA)||74 frames per second (51 frames per second – 1% low)||83 frames per second (56 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Tomb Raider: Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX 12, Highest Preset, TAA)||81 frames per second (42 frames per second – 1% low)||83 frames per second (45 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Strange Brigade is a band of misfits who (Vulkan, Ultra Preset)||138 frames per second (108 frames per second – 1% low)||145 frames per second (111 frames per second – 1% low)|
|The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is the third installment of The Witcher franchise (DX 11, Ultra Preset, Hairworks On 4)||94 frames per second (67 frames per second – 1% low)||97 frames per second (68 frames per second – 1% low)|
- In campaign mode, Battlefield V and The Witcher 3 were recorded with Fraps/in-game FPS counter.
- Games like Far Cry 5, Middle Earth, Strange Brigade, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Tomb Raider were recorded using the Benchmark utility that came with the game.
- Based on these settings, a Red Dead Redemption 2 optimized profile was created.
The tests mentioned above are rasterization-only tests, and here are some RTX findings.
|Optimus FHD Turbo||80-95W TUF A15 Ryzen 7 5800H + RTX 3060||Core i7-11800H + RTX 3060 80-95W TUF F15|
|Battlefield V is a first-person shooter that was (DX 12, Ultra Preset, RTX ON, DLSS OFF)||71 frames per second (51 frames per second – 1% low)||75 frames per second (51 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Cyberpunk 2077 (DLSS Auto, DX 12, Ultra Preset + RTX)||41 frames per second (32 frames per second – 1% low)||44 frames per second (35 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Tomb Raider: Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX 12, Highest Preset, TAA, RTX Ultra)||50 frames per second (21 frames per second – 1% low)||57 frames per second (25 frames per second – 1% low)|
Once again, the Intel setup offers a minor advantage of up to 10% on specific titles.
However, we noted substantial differences in how the two systems handle different games and how Dynamic Boost 2.0 distributes power between the CPU and GPU. The Intel model, for the most part, allocates more power to the CPU and takes it away from the GPU, resulting in a 5-10W reduction in GPU power. Given that the Intel arrangement is newer and that drivers may tune this feature more, framerates on the Intel variant may improve even more.
For example, the Intel version of Cyberpunk 2077 consumes 40 watts of CPU power and 85 watts of GPU power, while the AMD version consumes 20 watts of CPU power and 95 watts of GPU power. Despite this, the framerates recorded by both are identical. The components in the Intel laptop, on the other hand, run at much greater temperatures.
While the power allocations change between the titles tested, on average, the Intel model allocates 5-10W more combined CPU+GPU power to the components, which is why it runs hotter internally, especially on the GPU side. We’ll go over it in more detail in our thorough review comparison of these two TUF Gaming laptops, which are recognized for not having the most capable thermal designs in their class.
Finally, I’d want to discuss battery life, which is particularly important for daily use and video streaming.
The AMD setup outperforms the Intel variant by a wide amount, providing 9-12 hours of Youtube and Netflix streaming on a single charge, whilst the Intel variant only lasts 6-8 hours. When it comes to browsing, word processing, and normal multitasking, the differences are minimal, with the AMD option lasting slightly longer.
Expect no more than 1-2 hours of use on a charge with games and strenuous applications, as well as lower performance than these notebooks give when plugged in.
The bottom line
In your next laptop, you can’t go wrong with either the Intel i7-11800H or the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H processors. In terms of overall performance, the newer Intel CPU has a tiny advantage, but keep in mind that we tested these using SR memory, and upgrading to faster RAM may bring the two closer together. That will be the subject of a future article.
The AMD platform outperforms its Intel counterparts in terms of overall efficiency, resulting in longer runtimes, lower power consumption, and lower temperatures, maybe backed up by lower noise levels.
Higher CPU rates, more Cache RAM, and some technology enhancements, such as support for speedier storage, Thunderbolt 4, and Quick Sync, benefit the Intel platform, which may be important to some of you. Intel CPUs are also available in a wider range of laptops, including premium higher-tier machines, although AMD SKU choices remains limited, albeit much better than in the past.
Pricing will, of course, play a final factor in your selection, and I expect the AMD setup to have an advantage here, as it is an older platform that may see more reductions than the more recent Tiger Lake versions.
Finally, when it comes to choosing your next laptop, I recommend going past the Core i7-11800H versus Ryzen 7 5800H debate and considering all of the other factors that will affect your life with your computer, such as build quality, inputs, screens, and everything else. All of these are covered in detail in our in-depth evaluations, so be sure to read them.
Disclaimer: Our work is entirely funded by our readers. We may receive an affiliate commission if you purchase something after clicking on one of our links. Find out more.
Dieser Text ist empfindlich. Versuchen Sie, eine neue Kopie zu erstellen.. Read more about ryzen 7 5800h vs i7-11800h and let us know what you think.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ryzen 7 better than Ryzen 5 for gaming?
Ryzen 7 is better for gaming because it has a higher base clock speed and more cores.
Which is better for gaming i7 or Ryzen 7?
Ryzen 7 is better for gaming because it has a higher clock speed.
Is Ryzen 7 3800XT good for gaming?
Yes, Ryzen 7 3800XT is a great processor for gaming.